Chloe releases either a movie/picture gallery or diary entry two or three times A WEEK. Which you would know if you ever signed up for a membership. Shame on you!
You misunderstood. The “new” material released each week looks like it is years old from an archive she has amassed. I make this comment after being a subscriber to her site for many years.
so what is the truth then? is it old material or new? or there’s no way to actually find out?
admin
I don’t agree that it looks old. The new releases are higher quality larger images than older stuff in the archives. To me it looks new from the settings/locations/clothing all that stuff it looks modern and contemporary. I don’t understand how you can say the content released each week looks like it is years old – it just doesn’t look that way to me, it looks like it was shot very recently. Do you also think that the diary entries are years old?
Liverdamager
I may be wrong. She is incredible. But you don’t seem to know with certainty either. Anyway, I didn’t intend to start an argument.
Nothing wrong with a spirited debate, livens the place up :) You are quite right – I don’t know for certain any more than you. I don’t know her personally, don’t even know who the photographer is. But I do look at this stuff all day, and my take on it is that the latest content is pretty recent. But yes I could be wrong. Is there any way to know for certain? Have you perhaps as a member raised this issue with them? If so have you had any reply?
My first reply was so direct and argumentative because I ( wrongly – apologies ) assumed you were like so many others out there who are critical without ever signing up for memberships and seeing what is on offer.
pic 6 is perfect :-) Love chloe
It seems all of Chloe’s photos were taken years ago and she releases nothing new. Shame.
Chloe releases either a movie/picture gallery or diary entry two or three times A WEEK. Which you would know if you ever signed up for a membership. Shame on you!
You misunderstood. The “new” material released each week looks like it is years old from an archive she has amassed. I make this comment after being a subscriber to her site for many years.
so what is the truth then? is it old material or new? or there’s no way to actually find out?
I don’t agree that it looks old. The new releases are higher quality larger images than older stuff in the archives. To me it looks new from the settings/locations/clothing all that stuff it looks modern and contemporary. I don’t understand how you can say the content released each week looks like it is years old – it just doesn’t look that way to me, it looks like it was shot very recently. Do you also think that the diary entries are years old?
I may be wrong. She is incredible. But you don’t seem to know with certainty either. Anyway, I didn’t intend to start an argument.
Nothing wrong with a spirited debate, livens the place up :) You are quite right – I don’t know for certain any more than you. I don’t know her personally, don’t even know who the photographer is. But I do look at this stuff all day, and my take on it is that the latest content is pretty recent. But yes I could be wrong. Is there any way to know for certain? Have you perhaps as a member raised this issue with them? If so have you had any reply?
My first reply was so direct and argumentative because I ( wrongly – apologies ) assumed you were like so many others out there who are critical without ever signing up for memberships and seeing what is on offer.